Another one bites the dust
|
Posted By: William Posted on: Feb. 11, 2008 at 10:46 PM  7 Comments
|
5.0 / 5
Based on 1 ratings.
|
Print
Email Friend
Add to Favorites
del.icio.us
Digg It!
Slashdot It!
I just heard on the news that Rep John Shadegg has decided not to run. Has anyone heard in any way why he would do this? Was he afraided about the Democrat or Independent that was running against him or was the handwriting on the wall. AA, you are resident expert in cutting and running. What happen? Will some truth about Shadegg coming out that the public doesn't know. Remember, the truth will set you free and to run before the law finds out, means you can stay free one more day. I will waiting for the almighty AA's answer. The man with wisdom. Am I full of bull now.
Anonymous commenting has been disabled, you must login to comment on articles.
Signup for an accountComments:
|
Feb. 11, 2008 at 11:11:52 PM
|
|
| Terry Goddard. He could resign his AG spot. |
||
|
Feb. 11, 2008 at 11:48:33 PM
|
|
| William should re-register as a Republican, and Janet can appoint him. That would finally put a merciful end to William's CD2 campaign pitches on this site. William Crum for Senate!!!! |
||
|
Feb. 12, 2008 at 09:44:38 AM
|
|
| William, If the idea you presented had any merit I might talk you through this thing. But it doesn't, you don't and the very thought that what I could explain to you could possibly be understood by your meager reserve of brain cells is granting you much to say the least. No William, my answer to you will be what it is under most circumstances when you and I are forced into a one on one discussion about anything. I can't comprehend your question because it is based on an assumption that I would have insider knowledge of the Shadegg camp and I simply do not. You might want to next time ask for an opinion from myself or others. Be mentally well William. I would say God Bless you but until you are mentally sound blessings would really be lost on you for the greatest extent. |
||
|
Feb. 20, 2008 at 10:49:30 AM
|
Rating for this article
|
[This is a reply to comment by Average American on Feb. 12, 2008 at 09:44:38 AM]
Average American
Feb. 12, 2008 at 09:44:38 AM William, If the idea you presented had any merit I might talk you through this thing. But it doesn't, you don't and the very thought that what I could explain to you could possibly be understood by your meager reserve of brain cells is granting... View this Comment I thought that you and shadegg are related;that why I thought you might know. Oh no, I assumed something not in evident. That would make it hearsay. You are right for a change. I am running because of people like you and that's the fact, jack. |
||
|
Mar. 29, 2008 at 08:13:23 PM
|
|
[This is a reply to comment by William on Feb. 20, 2008 at 10:49:30 AM]
William
Feb. 20, 2008 at 10:49:30 AM I thought that you and shadegg are related;that why I thought you might know. Oh no, I assumed something not in evident. That would make it hearsay. You are right for a change. I am running because of people like you and that's the fact,... View this Comment Felony? |
||
|
|
Mar. 29, 2008 at 08:16:13 PM
|
Rating for this article
|
[This is a reply to comment by postman on Mar. 29, 2008 at 08:13:23 PM]
explain if you dare. |
||
Here's how it might play out (commenter Todd at Wactivist):
As Tony Cani points out:
Napolitano must, by law, appoint a Republican, probably someone who will promise not to run.
This means Shadegg can catch Dems flatfooted in November without anyone to challenge him. So who can we run now, if we need to, for this Senate seat?
Report Abuse