Men of the cloth have been influencing politics since the beginning of time, but why do they still matter? The Founding Fathers of America explicitly ruled out their participation in politics from the very start.
Priests, ministers, miracle workers and street performers have somehow obtained a permanent backdoor entrance, pun intended, into the American political arena.
I know republicans love breaching the Constitution by neglecting to ackknowledge the separation of church and state, but that's because most republicans aren't aware of the concept yet. They'll learn more when it's featured on "Are You Smarter Than a Fifth Grader?"
I also know democrats take advantage of the "church vote" just like their counterparts. It wins elections. The tide just hasn't been rolling their way lately.
John McCain was recently endorsed by an evangelical Texas pastor. He believes the US will be destroyed if it keeps advocating a land sharing agreement between Israel and Palestine. He also called Catholicism a whore and believes all natural atrocities are acts of god.
John Hagee is a divorcee with a 19,000 deep posse. Is this is how fat, old, white men are keeping up with rap moguls?
McCain gave a level-headed response about not agreeing with everything the man stands for, just some of his core principles. TV pundits did not force McCain to denounce him, refuse the endorsement or punch the man in the face the next time he sees him.
The truth of the matter is that people like Farrakhan and Hagee really don't matter. The backdoor they entered doesn't have a pathway to the presidency like other countries. It only has a hallway to a news headline.
The Founding Fathers knew what they were doing. Now it's up to Jeff Foxworthy to explain it to people.
McCain's got a Farrakhan
|
Posted By: R. D. Briceland Posted on: Mar. 11, 2008 at 10:16 AM |
0.0 / 5
Based on 0 ratings.
|
Anonymous commenting has been disabled, you must login to comment on articles.
Signup for an accountComments:
|
May. 3, 2008 at 10:54:34 PM
|
||
[This is a reply to comment by R. D. Briceland on May. 2, 2008 at 01:57:17 PM]
R. D. Briceland
May. 2, 2008 at 01:57:17 PM The difference between Obama attending services at a church with a radical pastor and John McCain seeking the political endorsement of a radical pastor is obvious to most. One sought spiritual guidance, the other seeks political influence. The fact that... View this Comment Obama shrinks inside his suit every time the Reverend opens his big mouth. Don't be surprised if the Reverend blurts out: "Obama promised to make me his Vice President!" " If I can't be VP then I will make sure he isn't POTUS! Damn Obama!" Blackmail? You have to feel sorry for Obama, with friends like his, who needs enemies? |
||







del.icio.us
Digg It!


The fact that McCain accepted the political endorsement of a racist pastor - who unequivocally despises the entire Islamic religion - contradicts his denouncement of this very brand of politics a few years back. Another example of him selling out his core beliefs to become prez.
Whose policy decisions are more likely to be influenced by a pastor, a man who listens to his sermons once a week then goes home, or a man who has a "you scratch my back, I'll scratch yours" political relationship with a pastor?
Report Abuse