Republican Justice & Troopergate
|
Posted By: June Posted on: Oct. 4, 2008 at 3:36 PM |
3.0 / 5
Based on 4 ratings.
|
We all know about the way Bush's hundreds of signing statements has subverted Congressional intent in the law-making process. We all know how the Bush administration's Executive Privilege argument has been successfully used, at least so far, to circumvent subpoenas of White House and DoJ staff in the Congressional investigation of the firings of nine U.S. Atorneys. We all know about those emails related to the firings that have turned up missing - both from White House servers and from illegal private accounts that were used to conduct government business. And we all know how the White house has forbid DoJ to cooperate with Congress in regard to those subpoenas.
Comments:
|
Oct. 4, 2008 at 05:19:44 PM
|
Rating for this article
|
|
| Thanks for a great and relevant article June! 5 stars for you. You betcha that, doggone it, Sarah is just Bush/Cheney in a dress. I heard today that McCain said he would have a "transparent" administration. HAHAHAHA. And what happened to Sarah Winky's promise that she would cooperate? But hey, did you hear that Obama is a Muslim? |
||
|
Anonymous Voice #36746
Oct. 4, 2008 at 08:46:32 PM
|
|
| Well dog gone it. You betcha.
|
||
|
Oct. 5, 2008 at 01:15:59 AM
|
||
| Oversight? Oh, well I'll get backto ya on that, ok?
|
||
|
Oct. 5, 2008 at 06:01:40 AM
|
||
| Consider the continuum from Nixon's B&E, through Reagan's gunrunning, to Bush's open defiance of justice. Nixon and Reagan tried to keep their misdeeds under wraps but Bush and Cheney have taken us from plausible deniability to public contempt for the legal foundation of accountability in government! Sarah's been on board for some time, too - when the Wasilla City Council objected to her unauthorized $50,000 expenditure to renovate her office, she responded, "I'm the mayor, I can do whatever I want until the courts tell me I can't!" Mr Nobody: what you say about the subpoenas may well be true but the very fact that Sarah's AG would counsel state employees to NOT respond to Legisative subpoenas - and that Sarah would countenance such direction - should be enough to call her integrity into question. Is that the way elected officials should view their accountability? Indie & Phaedrus: Yeah, transparency and oversight! Jim Lehrer and Gwen ifill missed their opportunity to ask the candidates what those terms mean to them. Perhaps upcoming moderators will be more astute - and have some follow-up questions dealing with the restoration of checks and balances in Washington! Would love to hear McSame's Reaganesque dodge, though Sarah's non sequitur would have been more entertaining, you betcha! |
||
|
Oct. 5, 2008 at 06:17:02 AM
|
||
| Junie you little stinker, Gov. Palin acted within her legal authority when she dismissed the public safety director. A fact that seems to be lost on you. In an email written shortly after being fired the public safety director implored his successor to establish a close working relationship with Palin, to not make the same mistake he did. But to Junie it's "political" malfeasance when a Republican govenor or President acts within the scope of their authority or writes an opinion in the form of a signing statement.
|
||
|
Oct. 5, 2008 at 07:09:03 AM
|
Rating for this article
|
|
[This is a reply to comment by AZRWinger on Oct. 5, 2008 at 06:17:02 AM]
AZRWinger
Oct. 5, 2008 at 06:17:02 AM Junie you little stinker, Gov. Palin acted within her legal authority when she dismissed the public safety director. A fact that seems to be lost on you. In an email written shortly after being fired the public safety director implored his successor to... View this Comment First AZRWinger, Thanks for a thoughtful response, rather than vicious name-calling as, unfortunately, most of your right wing comrades are prone to do here. It is refreshing. Secondly, if everything is so up and up, why not just cooperate with the investigation? Why not answer the subpoenas? Why not hand over the emails? That is what a innocent public servant who promises transparency would do. That is Sarah promised to do. |
||
|
Oct. 5, 2008 at 08:04:44 AM
|
||
| The opening preface of this article indicates that you are still in slash and burn mode concerning all things GOP related. Too bad you did not take the time to actually read statements by that terminated state employee in which he said he was being coaxed by Democratic operatives to throw Palin under the bus. When he refused, these same operatives attempted to twist this story for the moronic consumer like yourself who simply drinks that which is laid before her by the grace of the party you support.
|
||
|
Oct. 5, 2008 at 08:49:44 AM
|
||
[This is a reply to comment by AZRWinger on Oct. 5, 2008 at 06:17:02 AM]
AZRWinger
Oct. 5, 2008 at 06:17:02 AM Junie you little stinker, Gov. Palin acted within her legal authority when she dismissed the public safety director. A fact that seems to be lost on you. In an email written shortly after being fired the public safety director implored his successor to... View this Comment Wringer - this isn't the first time you've said "nothin' to see here" - but, when challenged, you pull a Houdini!Look Dunce, no one has disputed Sarah's "legal authority" to terminate Commissioner Monegan's appointment!Look Apologist, this is an ETHICS INVESTIGATION - an investigation to establish the probability that Sarah ETHICALLY TERMINATED Commissioner Mohegan! The facts that have emerged thus far would indicate that probability is pretty low, if not non-existent!In case you've miss the point, I don't share Indie's charitable interpretation of your response. Your low-info comrades can't speak to the issue while you, on the other hand, can only offer obfuscation.I do share Indie's thoughts about Sarah's lack of transparency but could care less what you think of it - the dozens of contacts from Sarah's staff, her political allies and her hubby pounding Monegan to reopen his already-completed investigation of Trooper Wooten looks, smells and feels like a familial vendetta!Were that a legitimate request in the public's best interest, Sarah could have made an above-board, up-front formal request through appropriate channels and cited the justification therfor! She didn't!Nor has she tried to stop the Republican cover-up that's well underway!And, you Wringer, expect us to give her a pass? Darn it, get real! |
||
|
Oct. 5, 2008 at 09:17:34 AM
|
||
[This is a reply to comment by Average American on Oct. 5, 2008 at 08:04:44 AM]
Average American
Oct. 5, 2008 at 08:04:44 AM The opening preface of this article indicates that you are still in slash and burn mode concerning all things GOP related. Too bad you did not take the time to actually read statements by that terminated state employee in which he said he was being... View this Comment BAA Boy - hey, get this: a preface is an opening, an introduction! Ewe can tell by the PRE-! Other than that grammatical redundancy, your comment is too incoherent for a meaningful response.I will state - for you and Wringer - that, once upon a time, politicians eschewed even the mere appearance of impropriety. Republicans superceded that with 'plausible denialbility' and, as i observed, Bush and Cheney have forsaken even that cover!How ever you wanta slice and dice it, it sure looks like Sarah's been caught with her hand in the cookie jar - all the way up to her elbow!And, so far as slash and burn goes, I'm just reporting on the self-immolation of the GOP! Kinda an irony, isn't it - a counterpoint to you and Toad's prediction that the Hillary/Obama fight would forever rend the Democratic Party! Wink Wink
|
||







del.icio.us
Digg It!

But... even if the Supreme Court agrees, and the subpoenaes are enforced, they won't be enforced until January. And, doggone it, you can betcha' that the report due in October won't be released 'cause of a lawsuit.
These problems will still be there when she returns to Alaska in November. No getting around that. Then what?
Report Abuse