I'm not sure how many of you actually venture away from CNN and C-SPAN but the Discovery Channel is a channel I visit on a daily basis for various shows but one of my favorite shows on the Discovery Channel is MythBusters. I've watched it from its inception about 5 years ago. MythBusters throws together many elements that makes a great show and keeps it educational. Jamie and Adam are a great duo full of likable characteristics with a great sense of science. Even everyone in their younger crew - Tori, Grand and Kari - has a great personality and strives to base their experiments off of the fundamentals of science. Needless to say, this crew just does a superb job in entertaining and educating.
So when I started to see commercials for Smash Lab it definitely peaked my interest because of the large impacts, collisions and explosions that were shown in their commercials. Though I knew nothing with the same basic idea as MythBusters could be as good as MythBusters I was still hoping that Smash Lab would be an entertaining and educational show. I was way off! Smash Lab is a joke of a show and should be an embarrassment to those who decided to even show it along side all of the great programming available on the Discovery Channel. The crew is not likable at all and their credibility is automatically called into question when you see the intro credits where they label each person. The girl on the show is simply labeled as a scientist. Based on the few episodes I've seen I would assume she's a "computer scientist" who formerly worked at Best Buy because none of what she's done has been impressive at all or even seemed scientific. When she does say something about physics or something about mathematics it sounds overly scripted and doesn't quite sound like she knows what she's talking about. I honestly haven't seen her partner on the show do anything worthwhile... he's always welding, driving or doing something else that serves no interest. The two lead guys in the show make me want to shoot myself with their metro haircuts and spoiled rich guy attitudes.
Speaking of rich - this show must have some kind of outrageous budget because of the materials these guys bring on to build useless items.... which is the premise of the show. Instead of testing myths with the scientific method, they try to come up with solutions to real world problems.
Every solution they approach is a ridiculous idea. The most recent episode that I watched and paid attention to was the show where they were trying to create a device to slow down or stop a suspect in a police chase. The first thing they came up with was the idea that CO2 from fire extinguishers shot into the air intake of a car shuts down the car due to the decrease in oxygen flow which is required for an internal combustion engine. Now I'm sure some people may not have known that you can do this but it really wasn't educational to me but let's continue assuming most people didn't know how an internal combustion engine worked. Ok so now you've learned 1 element of a car's engine, now what? Now we'll learn that it only takes 14% CO2 in the air mixture to shut down an engine or something. This part I actually liked because it seemed like they were starting to approach the problem logically and scientifically. But then again it seemed like a waste of time and they knew it by admitting that they couldn't do much with the results with the device they were building so it was all just a big waste of time.
They should have just stopped the whole fire extinguisher idea right there and approached the problem differently but they continued by building some improbable, unrealistic solutions to their problem such as throwing some large magnetic device onto the perpetrator's car while going 70mph which - thankfully - they gave up on after a couple trials. The younger SL crew was able to prove that it was possible to stall the car's engine going at 30mph from a distance of 10 feet (I think) using a giant extinguisher with a cone-shape nozzle.
But low and behold they go on to ORDER a robotic prototype (MythBusters would have built their own) to attach to the back of a car which extended using a remote control from said car. The idea behind it was that the police car would extend the arm in front of the perpetrator's car and then CO2 from some tanks in the trunk would be shot out from a nozzle at the end of the robotic arm.
Needless to say, their plan failed miserably at 60mph as they strayed from the working "model" with their ridiculous robotic arm. I don't think they even tried stalling a car engine using the robotic arm with a parked car.
Even if their idea did work, it probably wouldn't work. Here's why, they assume that all cars have an air intake right behind the grill which is untrue... most have them around the wheel well to gather a colder air flow. And then there is the obvious reason - who is going to let a cop car pull up in front of you and extend a robotic arm in front of you as you're trying to run from the cops? Wouldn't most people hit the cop car, speed up, break the extended arm, etc?
Anyway, that is just one of their episodes. Another recent one I saw had the objective of building a boat seat that would eject the driver in the event of a collision. They had some decent ideas but didn't approach the tests correctly and their remote ejection system didn't even work because it wasn't tested before doing the live run. So they smashed the boat into another boat and shook their heads in shame as they went on to repair the boat for the next run.
I could go on and on about the other episodes I've seen but I don't want to bore you all.
I hate the show and can't wait until it drops off of the Discovery Channel. Hopefully they replace it with something worthwhile.
Smash Lab: A Giant Flop
|
Posted By: Pinb@ll Wiz@rd Posted on: Apr. 10, 2008 at 12:37 AM |
0.0 / 5
Based on 0 ratings.
|
Anonymous commenting has been disabled, you must login to comment on articles.
Signup for an accountComments:
|
Apr. 10, 2008 at 11:02:17 AM
|
||
| Mythbusters, the show w/ Bear the Brit Marine dude surviving alone, Survivor Man and anything on Nat. Geo. are 90% of what we watch.
|
||
|
Apr. 10, 2008 at 11:03:53 AM
|
||
| Yeah, so far Smash lab sux. But I'd give it 6 episodes. Mythbusters started kinda weak too.
|
||
|
Apr. 10, 2008 at 11:17:16 AM
|
||
[This is a reply to comment by Phaedrus on Apr. 10, 2008 at 11:03:53 AM]
Phaedrus
Apr. 10, 2008 at 11:03:53 AM Yeah, so far Smash lab sux. But I'd give it 6 episodes. Mythbusters started kinda weak... View this Comment I think the problem lies mostly with the cast. If they took the same idea and budget and gave it to a different, more intelligent cast I think the show would be great. |
||
|
Apr. 10, 2008 at 11:49:42 AM
|
||
| Survivor Man is a good show. The poor guy puts himself in those "Lost" situations and he usually survives, but sometimes he has to be rescued. Humbling. What I don't care for are the scorpion lunches that he treats himself to. Also the hauling of camera equipment looks like a big pain in the ass and makes me so tired watching that I start dozing. And I hate that f*in harmonica! Who carries a harmonica with them at all times!? |
||
|
Apr. 10, 2008 at 05:13:06 PM
|
||
| Mythbusters rocks. Haven't seen this Smash Lab, but will avoid it based on your opinion Pinball..you seem to have good judgement. Other Discovery Favorites: Dirty Jobs with Mike Rowe. Especially when he has to take his shirt off.......OOH LA LA! How It's Made. Fascinating look at how things big, small, simple or complicated are manufactured. Plant Earth. Breathtaking. |
||
|
Apr. 10, 2008 at 05:15:32 PM
|
||
[This is a reply to comment by indie616 on Apr. 10, 2008 at 05:13:06 PM]
indie616
Apr. 10, 2008 at 05:13:06 PM Mythbusters rocks. Haven't seen this Smash Lab, but will avoid it based on your opinion Pinball..you seem to have good judgement. Other Discovery Favorites: Dirty Jobs with Mike Rowe. Especially when he has to take his shirt... View this Comment INDIE HAS SPOKEN. NO MORE COMMENTS! |
||
|
Apr. 10, 2008 at 06:27:06 PM
|
||
[This is a reply to comment by Average American on Apr. 10, 2008 at 05:15:32 PM]
Wow! Dear Sergeant Average, I guess that little tiff we had about military service on another thread left a mark! Try to get over it and leave it out of unrelated articles and subsequent threads for the sake of the authors of excellent articles such as this one. |
||
|
Apr. 10, 2008 at 11:00:09 PM
|
||
[This is a reply to comment by Average American on Apr. 10, 2008 at 05:15:32 PM]
Looks like Indie has really gotten under your skin with this armed-service issue. Look AA, you let this thing damage you when a caller brought up you non-service pro-war weakness up last year, and you are doing the same thing now. Trying to justify how you wanted to serve, but couldn't because of X or Y -- that just sounds like weak excuse making. Just own up to it. You, like millions of other Americans, do not feel like you have to show your patriotism by leaning how to shoot the enemy. I know that's one way, I guess, but I know many other patriots who show their patriotism by going into the foreign service, or dedicating their time to community service. It's just a conceit that serving your country in the military is the only way to serve your country. You know that too. The reason that Indie keeps throwing this back in your face is because you make it worse by your less than compelling excuses. She hits a nerve because you know that your choosing to get a good job, care for your wife, raise a family, and write letters of encouragement to the troops does not distinguish you at all from the soldiers who are currently fighting at your behest. The fact is that you have repeatedly flaunted your ability to lead a profligate life of consumption with your five cars and appliances running at full tilt. This kind of undermines your ability to claim that you are doing the patriotic thing back home, while the soldiers you pat on the back are dying for your ability to live high on the hog. You are a walking talking Support the Troops bumper sticker on the back of a Ford Excursion speeding to the supermarket with one passenger behind the wheel. |
||
|
Apr. 10, 2008 at 11:06:16 PM
|
||
[This is a reply to comment by www.MoronInCharge.com on Apr. 10, 2008 at 11:00:09 PM]
www.MoronInCharge.com
Apr. 10, 2008 at 11:00:09 PM Looks like Indie has really gotten under your skin with this armed-service issue. Look AA, you let this thing damage you when a caller brought up you non-service pro-war weakness up last year, and you are doing the same thing now. Trying to justify... View this Comment First off, this is not up for discussion anymore. Indie said so...lol Second, the day I drive a FORD is the day I move to Canada and start raising French Poodles. I drive a Tahoe and I do not believe in placing a bumper sticker on anything I own. Why would I depreciate the value of a vehicle. Lastly, I justify nothing. It started as an attempt to stop someone else from throwing around the "coward" moniker. I don't think anyone here is a coward. I think some are stupid and others misguided, but no cowards. Now twist this all you want, I couldn't give a s***. have a nice evening. I have nothing else to say about it. I owe no one here anything and I can tell you I will not try to stand up for anyone else on this site. TO think I was trying to actually help Capitan Cut and Paste. Even he gave me s*** for it. Won't make that mistake again. Finally, nothing gets under my skin. Especially not Indie. She's a girl. |
||







del.icio.us
Digg It!


The girl in the show, Deanne Bell, has a degree in mechanical engineering and worked as an aerospace engineer before being cast for the show. This still doesn't mean that she's qualified for the show. As far as I know Kari from MythBusters doesn't have an engineering degree and yet she fits well on MythBusters and actually has plenty of intelligent things to say.
Not to mention, she's easy on the eyes.
Report Abuse